Future-proofing building penetrations

Share page here

Building services change over time. Plant is replaced, technology is upgraded and operational needs shift. These changes can create a need for new building penetrations or modifications to existing ones. Planning for future alterations at the design stage can reduce disruption, avoid costly remedial work and protect building performance throughout its service life.

Jamie Sporcic, Senior Sales Manager at Jones Weatherproofing, explains that effective future-proofing begins with careful consideration of the service layout. “It should allow sufficient space for additional pipes, cables and ductwork. Future changes should also be assessed for their impact on the appearance of the roof or facade, as well as on weatherproofing, thermal performance, fire performance and maintenance requirements,” he says.

For architects, facade designers, roofing contractors and M&E teams, considering these issues early can make future upgrades easier to manage and reduce the risk of costly remedial work.

Why building services and penetrations change over time

Building services and penetrations evolve as a building’s use and requirements change.

“Plant is replaced, technology is upgraded, building use changes and capacity increases,” Jamie points out. “These factors can alter a building’s services and the penetrations that accommodate them.”

For example, when a data centre expands its capacity, additional servers increase demand for power and cooling. This may require new roof or vertical penetrations to carry those services into and out of the building.

“While some changes can be anticipated during the initial design phase, others will emerge as the building’s needs evolve,” Jamie says. “It is not possible to plan for every eventuality, but identifying future requirements can reduce the need for disruptive alterations later.”

How future changes to building penetrations can affect the building envelope

Every new or modified penetration can affect the performance of the building envelope. The consequences depend on the location, construction and services involved, but may include:

  • Weather resistance – New building penetrations or alterations to existing ones can create routes for water ingress. Careful weatherproofing is therefore essential for any work involving service penetrations.
  • Thermal performance and airtightness – Changes to penetrations can cause air leakage and may affect insulation continuity, leading to cold spots and thermal bridges.
  • Fire strategy – When penetrations pass through fire-resisting elements, they may affect fire performance.

Beyond technical performance, service penetrations may also affect the appearance of the roof or facade and may have implications for product warranties or guarantees.

Which buildings are most likely to need service penetration flexibility?

Service penetrations in any building can change over time. However, flexibility is especially important in highly serviced environments, where technology, equipment and operational demands change frequently.

Examples include:

  • Data centres – Changes to computing capacity and cooling requirements can require upgrades to power supplies, cabling and mechanical services.
  • Pharmaceutical facilities and laboratories – New equipment and evolving operational requirements can mean new service penetrations.
  • Hospitals and healthcare facilities – Specialist equipment and changes to clinical requirements may require modifications to building penetrations.
  • Industrial buildings – New building occupants and equipment upgrades can lead to new service penetrations over time.

The degree of flexibility required will vary from project to project. Jamie explains: “Understanding the building’s intended use, expected lifespan and potential maintenance or upgrade cycles can help the team anticipate the most likely changes. We can also allow space and flexibility in the design to make future changes easier to accommodate.”

 

Data centre facade with panelling

 

How can building penetrations be future-proofed at the design stage?

The design stage offers the best opportunity to consider future service requirements before roof and facade layouts are finalised. Architects, M&E teams and other specialists should work together to identify foreseeable changes and assess how the design can accommodate them.

Depending on the project, useful measures may include:

  • Allowing for future capacity – Include space for additional cabling, pipework or ductwork.
  • Planning service routes for access – Consider how services can be accessed for inspection, maintenance, modification and weatherproofing.
  • Coordinating penetration locations – Where appropriate, group services to reduce the number of individual penetrations.

Coordinating future changes to building penetrations across disciplines

Responsibility for building penetrations is shared across several construction disciplines, including M&E, roofing, cladding, structural engineering and weatherproofing. Each team needs to understand potential future requirements and how their work can affect other parts of the building.

“Without effective coordination,” Jamie warns, “one discipline could restrict future access, introduce conflicting details or leave weatherproofing requirements unresolved.”

Jamie explains that involving a weatherproofing specialist, such as Jones Weatherproofing, during the design phase gives the project team an opportunity to consider penetration details as part of the overall building envelope. “A weatherproofing specialist installs the weatherproofing system, but can also provide advice, identify potential constraints and help coordinate with other trades.”

Managing changes to building penetrations throughout the building lifecycle

Future-proofing is an ongoing part of a building’s lifecycle. At handover, accurate records of the installed services and associated weatherproofing details should be provided. These can help building owners and maintenance teams understand the existing service penetration arrangements and make informed decisions about future changes.

Jamie notes that any alterations should be properly planned and carried out, with careful attention to weather resistance, thermal performance and other relevant building requirements. “Before adding or altering a penetration, the surrounding construction should be carefully assessed. If this reveals deterioration, substrate issues, access problems or insufficient information, a further specialist assessment may be required, along with additional preparation or remedial work,” he adds.

Where possible, records should include relevant drawings, photographs and product information. They should be updated when services are added, removed or modified so that project teams can work from accurate documentation.

Find out more about future-proofing your building penetrations

Jones Weatherproofing works with project teams to develop weatherproofing strategies for building penetrations. Our specialist liquid-applied weatherproofing can accommodate any building penetration layout without the need for pre-formed products. This makes it ideal for penetration retrofits and upgrades.

In addition, our team can provide guidance on proposed penetration arrangements, advise on future-proofing measures and coordinate weatherproofing details with other disciplines.

Looking to future-proof your building penetrations? Get project help from Jones Weatherproofing for specialist support with complex and changing service requirements.

When should building penetration weatherproofing specialists be involved in a building project?

Share page here

The earlier you involve a weatherproofing specialist in a building penetrations project, the better. Ideally, this should happen during the design stage to give the project the best chance of developing a robust weatherproofing strategy. If that phase has passed, bringing in a specialist as soon as possible can help protect the building while reducing risks to the project’s budget and programme.

Why is early engagement with a weatherproofing specialist important?

Where pipes, cables and ductwork pass through the building envelope, careful detailing is necessary to maintain weather resistance and help prevent damage.

Without a weatherproofing specialist involved from the outset, responsibility can be passed from one trade to another until the work is almost complete. Resolving weatherproofing details at this stage may require remedial work to gain access to the penetration.

Involving Jones Weatherproofing early clarifies responsibilities and allows architects, façade designers, roofing contractors and M&E teams to address weatherproofing of both roof and vertical penetrations as part of the wider project design.

 

Complex service riser weatherproofed in London
Data centre facade with panelling

 

What are the benefits of involving a weatherproofing specialist early in a building penetrations project?

Getting the Jones Weatherproofing team involved early allows us to advise on service locations, weatherproofing details, structural considerations and how the work fits into the programme.

Benefits include:

  • Expertise and experience – Weatherproofing specialists can identify issues early and recommend effective solutions.
    Trade coordination – Including weatherproofing in the project programme from the start improves access and enables different trades to work together efficiently.
  • Clear responsibilities – Responsibility for weatherproofing often falls between trades. Early engagement minimises disputes.
    Accurate, detailed drawings – Jones Weatherproofing can produce new drawings, review existing ones and advise on the proposed details.
  • Programme planning and fewer late-stage changes – Identifying potential challenges early can reduce the need for late changes. If plans do change, the weatherproofing team can respond efficiently.
  • Less remedial work – If weatherproofing requirements are identified after services and other elements have been installed, parts of the installation may need to be removed or dismantled to provide access.

Where can I find a weatherproofing specialist for building penetrations on my next project?

Jones Weatherproofing works closely with project teams to develop weatherproofing strategies for building penetrations and install our cold-applied specialist weatherproofing system. We can begin working with teams at any stage of a project, but early engagement helps ensure the best results.

To involve a weatherproofing specialist in your next building penetrations project, get in contact Jones Weatherproofing.

Key considerations when specifying weatherproofing for service penetrations

Share page here

Weatherproofing for service penetrations can often be addressed late in a project, after roof coverings and wall finishes have been installed, building services are in place and access has become more restricted.

At this stage, weatherproofing penetrations can be more challenging. Other building elements may be in the way, scaffolding may have been removed and rainwater may have already begun to seep into the structure and cause damage.

Early engagement with weatherproofing specialists such as the Jones Weatherproofing team can help ensure service penetrations such as vertical penetrations are protected in the right way and at the right stage of a project. This can reduce the risk of remedial works, avoid unnecessary disruption and ensure weatherproofing is integrated effectively with the overall building design and requirements.

But what factors should specifiers and architects think about when planning weatherproofing for services within roof penetrations? In this blog, we will look at some of the considerations that can help ensure durable, effective weather protection for the building fabric and the building’s contents and occupants.

Type: What kind of service penetration weatherproofing is right for the project?

Various methods can be used to weatherproof a service riser. Traditional dog-kennel-style enclosures have been used for many years and may provide a suitable option in some situations. However, they also have limitations, as they tend to take up a lot of space and, being fixed structures, they don’t offer flexibility if services need to be modified at a later stage.

Matthew Jones, commercial director at Jones Weatherproofing, explains that liquid-applied weatherproofing allows service penetrations to be weatherproofed directly around the services. “This minimises space requirements and also allows greater flexibility during installation and future modifications. The result is a joint-free weatherproofing layer that is both durable and adaptable,” he says.

Placement: Where should a service penetration be located?

The right location for a service penetration will depend on factors such as the amount of available space, roof geometry and the positions of other building elements. Ideally, the placement of penetrations should be considered early in the design process, before the roof or wall build-up is finalised. This will help ensure that the penetration can be installed correctly and weatherproofed effectively.

“Plans can, and do, change during construction,” Matthew notes. “Penetrations move or their sizes change as the project progresses. Because of this, the weatherproofing system needs to be flexible enough to accommodate changes to penetration size and placement,” he says.

When positioning a service penetration, check the following:

  • Keep penetrations away from roof edges or junctions, as this can make weatherproofing more complex.
  • Ensure sufficient space around each penetration, allowing room for weatherproofing, maintenance and inspection.
  • Consider the proximity of other penetrations and roof installations, as positioning them too close together may restrict access or complicate the weatherproofing process.
  • Check roof falls and drainage to ensure water cannot collect around the penetration.

Access: How will the weatherproofing team access the service penetration?

The weatherproofing team will need safe and practical access to the service penetration. This is often easiest before other building elements, such as plant or walkways on roofs, are installed. On walls, it is generally preferable to complete the weatherproofing before cladding or other finishes are installed.

“Where scaffolding, platforms or lifting equipment are required for access, it makes sense to schedule the weatherproofing works while these are already on site,” Matthew explains. “Doing so can help avoid unnecessary delays and costs, as well as the need to bring access equipment back to site later in the project,” he adds.

Programming: When is the best time to carry out weatherproofing?

Weatherproofing should be installed as early as possible after the penetrations have been installed and before access becomes restricted. The exact timing will depend on project requirements, but coordinating the work with other trades will help improve accessibility, reduce the risk of delays and avoid the need to remove completed building elements to access the penetration.

Structural integrity: How can service penetration weatherproofing maintain building performance?

The primary role of service penetration weatherproofing is to prevent the impact of weather, protecting the building from rot, mould and mildew, which can lead to structural deterioration.

“The weatherproofing system should therefore provide a durable seal that protects the building structure, and it should be installed before things like rainwater can get into the structure,” explains Matthew. “It should also be flexible enough to accommodate normal building movement caused by thermal changes, loading and settlement without cracking or compromising the watertight barrier,” he adds.

Future access: Will the service penetration require maintenance, modification or inspection?

Over the life of the building, service penetrations may require maintenance, modification or inspection. Careful planning can help ensure that future access is possible without having to remove other elements or bring in access equipment unnecessarily.

 

Gloucester energy from waste wide project shot

 

Durability: How long will the service penetration weatherproofing last?

Long-term protection against water ingress is the goal, and a good system needs to withstand exposure to weather, UV radiation and normal building movement over many years. The right weatherproofing system can reduce maintenance requirements and lower the likelihood of remedial works over the life of the building.

“Jones Weatherproofing’s cold-applied liquid weatherproofing system is backed by a 25-year system warranty,” Matthew notes.

Compatibility: Is the service penetration weatherproofing suitable for the roof or wall build-up?

The weatherproofing system should be compatible with the surrounding roof or wall construction, including membranes, roof coverings, cladding systems and insulation materials. A system that can be used across multiple substrates helps simplify specification and ensures a consistent weatherproofing approach where different construction materials meet.

“At Jones Weatherproofing, our liquid weatherproofing resin is cold-applied and solvent-free. This makes it suitable for all roof types, including GRP roofs. It requires no heat for application or curing and hardens in less than an hour,” Matthew adds.

Aesthetics: Does the service penetration weatherproofing complement the design intent?

Good weatherproofing protects the building without detracting from its appearance. Bulky enclosures such as those in off-the-shelf systems can interrupt the visual lines of a building, while colour schemes should also be preserved wherever possible. Liquid-applied weatherproofing sits flush with the roof surface for a clean and discreet finish, and it can be colour-matched to the roof covering to help maintain the design intent and match any branding requirements.

Fire performance: Does the roof penetration support compliance with fire safety standards?

Fire safety is a critical consideration for all buildings. Approved Document B (England) states that for a roof system to be considered ‘unrestricted’ in use, it must achieve the BROOF(t4) classification. Similar requirements exist in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

BROOF(t4) classification applies to complete roof assemblies rather than individual products. This means that the fire performance of penetration weatherproofing must be considered as part of the wider roof system, including the substrate, insulation and other components.

Jones Weatherproofing systems have been tested as part of complete roof assemblies that have achieved BROOF(t4) classification in accordance with BS EN 13501-5:2016. These test results demonstrate that Jones Weatherproofing systems can form part of roof assemblies achieving BROOF(t4) classification when installed as part of a tested configuration.

Bespoke solutions: What are the benefits of a tailored service penetration weatherproofing approach?

At Jones Weatherproofing, we offer bespoke weatherproofing using a cold-applied liquid suitable for use with any type of cladding or building system. The result is a joint-free installation that prevents leaks and thermal breaks while contributing to the thermal performance of the building. We also provide comprehensive technical support and project planning, helping to ensure that weatherproofing is carried out effectively and at the right time to meet the project requirements.

Get in touch to discuss how we can support the weatherproofing requirements of your upcoming projects.

The benefits of specifying weatherproofing systems for building penetrations

Share page here

Weatherproofing for building penetrations is still often treated as an afterthought, with decisions left until late in the construction programme or delegated to on-site trades.

Waiting to implement a weatherproofing strategy until late in the build may be common, but it also introduces risk. Projects are more vulnerable to inconsistent installation, programme delays and costly remedial work. Poorly weatherproofed penetrations can also allow water ingress, affecting the long-term performance of the building envelope.

By specifying weatherproofing at the design stage, architects and specifiers can ensure that penetration details are coordinated with the wider project from day one. This improves communication, helps protect the design intent and reduces the likelihood of unplanned changes during construction.

The value of early weatherproofing specification

Across the construction industry, there is an increasing focus on coordinated design, accountability and clearly defined responsibilities.

The Building Safety Act 2022, for example, introduced strict safety and accountability standards for higher-risk buildings, requiring clear lines of responsibility throughout the whole life of a building. It also emphasises the importance of the “golden thread”, a secure and up-to-date digital record of a building’s design, construction and ongoing maintenance. This reinforces the importance of specifying a weatherproofing system, rather than leaving decisions to be made on site.

Whether or not a building qualifies as high-risk, the benefits of specifying weatherproofing for building penetrations early in a project are clear. Inadequate weatherproofing can compromise a building’s structural integrity, as well as the safety of occupants and building contents. It can also cause project delays and lead to the need for remedial works before a building is even fully constructed.

From mission-critical buildings such as data centres and hospitals to retail buildings, football stadiums and manufacturing facilities, good weatherproofing reduces risk and improves project outcomes.

Why weatherproofing penetrations requires clear project communication

The responsibility for weatherproofing building penetrations is often unclear. Roofing contractors, MEP installers and specialist subcontractors may all be involved in creating and installing penetrations – but who should ensure that a penetration is weatherproofed, and who will be accountable if the weatherproofing fails? This is why clear communication is essential.

Specifying a dedicated weatherproofing partner establishes a strategy and a clear point of contact. Specialist knowledge, expert advice and an experienced installation team can all help ensure that the weatherproofing is carried out to a high standard, at the right time and in a way that will support the building envelope’s long-term performance.

Specifying weatherproofing for penetrations to meet project requirements

No two projects are the same. They have different roof build-ups, different exposures and different building penetration requirements.

Considering weatherproofing during the planning stages of a project, helps architects and specifiers ensure that the chosen system is compatible with the roof construction, that there is enough space for each penetration and that there is sufficient access for weatherproofing, long-term maintenance and inspection.

Fire performance may also be an important consideration when specifying weatherproofing systems, particularly on projects where external fire exposure requirements apply. BROOF(t4) classification relates to complete roof assemblies rather than individual products. Jones Weatherproofing systems have been tested as part of complete roof assemblies that have achieved BROOF(t4) classification in accordance with BS EN 13501-5:2016.

Matthew Jones, commercial director at Jones Weatherproofing, explains that working with a specialist weatherproofing contractor from the design stage also provides valuable technical expertise.

“Having someone focus specifically on weatherproofing helps ensure that all aspects are fully considered,” he says. “They can help identify potential challenges before construction begins and reduce the need for design changes later.”

 

Complex service riser weatherproofed in London

 

Preserving the architectural vision with weatherproofing for building penetrations

When weatherproofing is left until construction is underway – or nearly complete – it can limit the options available. Compromises may be made that don’t match the original design intent, and visible alterations may be necessary to accommodate penetration details.

And if the weatherproofing is carried out by a contractor who doesn’t have specialist knowledge, they may not be aware of the methods that could help to preserve the architectural vision.

In many cases, last-minute weatherproofing consideration can lead to the use of dog-kennel-style enclosures and other ready-made systems. While these can be effective, they are often poorly installed and incorrectly sized. They can also interrupt the roof’s visual lines and negatively impact the overall building aesthetic.

“Specifying weatherproofing early allows penetration details to be integrated into the overall roof design,” Matthew explains. “This helps to ensure that the completed building reflects the architect’s original vision, while also providing reliable protection from water ingress,” he says.

Matthew also notes that early engagement does not mean every detail is locked in from the beginning. “Building penetrations often change as a project develops. Working with a specialist weatherproofing contractor makes it easier to accommodate these changes without compromising performance or the project programme,” he adds.

Preventing the use of unsuitable weatherproofing systems

If weatherproofing requirements have not been clearly specified, contractors may need to rely on standard off-the-shelf products that are not ideally suited to the project. While these products may have appropriate applications, a more bespoke weatherproofing approach typically leads to better long-term outcomes.

“Jones Weatherproofing’s cold-applied liquid weatherproofing provides a seamless, fully bonded waterproof layer that can be formed around penetrations of almost any shape or size,” Matthew explains. “Unlike some traditional methods, it can accommodate irregular details and multiple services without relying on numerous individual fittings or joints.”

Specifying an appropriate weatherproofing system helps ensure that performance requirements are maintained throughout the life of the building and reduces the risk of inferior substitute products being introduced during construction.

How specifying weatherproofing for penetrations can help avoid project delays

Construction programmes rely on careful coordination between multiple trades. If penetration weatherproofing is not properly planned, installers may need to revisit completed work, remove newly installed building elements to gain access or make last-minute design changes before weatherproofing work can begin.

“By specifying weatherproofing early in the project, installation can be planned alongside other construction activities,” Matthew explains. “Penetrations can be sealed in the correct sequence, reducing disruption to other trades and helping minimise the risk of water ingress before the building envelope is complete.”

This coordinated approach helps maintain programme certainty, reduces unnecessary rework and supports on-time project delivery.

Specifying penetration weatherproofing from Jones Weatherproofing

Jones Weatherproofing works closely with architects, specifiers, contractors and project teams to provide weatherproofing that is tailored to specific project requirements.

Wherever possible, our team is involved from the earliest stages of a project. During specification, we can provide technical advice, develop suitable weatherproofing details and help coordinate installation with the wider construction programme.

Get in touch to find out how Jones Weatherproofing can support your next project’s weatherproofing requirements.

What are the risks of exposed building penetrations on data centres?

Share page here

Exposed building penetrations can be problematic for any type of building, potentially causing water damage and impacting performance. For mission-critical facilities such as data centres, the consequences of exposed building penetrations can be even more significant. They can lead to equipment damage, system downtime and service disruption.

At Jones Weatherproofing, our cold-applied liquid weatherproofing can be applied quickly and to any surface, including GRP roofs. It creates a strong and durable seal around exposed building penetrations, helping to provide long-term protection to data centre buildings and the sensitive equipment that they contain.

Below are the answers to frequently asked questions about the risk of exposed building penetrations on data centres.

What are the risks of exposed penetrations?

When a building penetration is exposed, it becomes vulnerable to moisture ingress. This can lead to a range of problems, including:

  • Leaks – Water from precipitation can enter through an exposed penetration, allowing moisture, including damp or drips, into the building.
  • Condensation – Gaps in the building fabric can impact performance, allowing interstitial condensation to form within walls, roofs or floors.
  • Damp – Persistent moisture from leaks or condensation can lead to persistent damp, which can damage equipment and cause problems such as mould, mildew and rot.
  • Structural damage – Moisture within the building envelope can contribute to deterioration, including timber rot and metal corrosion.
  • Contents damage – Water ingress can damage the items inside the building. In a data centre, this could mean expensive servers and other critical technology.
  • Equipment downtime – Even small amounts of water ingress can damage sensitive equipment, resulting in costly downtime and operational disruption that can affect a data centre’s reliability and reputation.
  • Poor indoor air quality – Damp conditions can encourage the growth of mould and mildew. This can negatively affect indoor air quality for the people inside the building.
  • Impact on occupant wellbeing – Leaks, damp, mould and poor indoor air quality can create an uncomfortable environment and may contribute to health issues for occupants. They can also affect a building’s thermal performance, and damp-related structural damage can create unsafe working conditions.

How does water ingress affect building penetrations?

Exposed or damaged penetrations allow water to get inside the building envelope. Once moisture is present, it can cause deterioration, making the penetration more vulnerable to further water ingress and creating a cycle of ongoing damage.

Can building penetrations be damaged by people working on site?

Yes. Building penetrations – particularly exposed penetrations – are often damaged by people working on site. This can be during construction or as part of ongoing maintenance once the building is complete. For this reason, building penetrations should be sealed with a resilient material that can withstand accidental impact, foot traffic and general site activity.

The potential for damaged building penetrations also highlights the importance of programme sequencing during construction. When penetration weatherproofing is completed at the appropriate stage of the build programme, it minimises the risk of damage and subsequent remedial works.

How can damaged building penetrations delay a project?

When building penetrations become damaged, they need to be repaired and resealed as quickly as possible to minimise risks to the building structure and contents.

While sealing a penetration with the Jones Weatherproofing cold-applied liquid weatherproofing can be quick, gaining access to the affected area is often more complicated.

Depending on the building design, accessing a penetration may require removing adjacent installations or finishes. These will then need to be reinstalled once the penetration is sealed. This additional work can lead to programme delays and added costs.

How can exposed building penetrations lead to water damage to equipment inside a building?

An exposed building penetration can take many forms. It might be a hairline gap between a service and the surrounding building fabric, or it can be a large opening created for a service riser. While it is easy to see how moisture can enter through larger gaps, it’s important to remember that even small openings can provide a pathway for water and moisture ingress.

Once water enters the building envelope, it can travel through the construction layers and into the building interior, where it may drip onto sensitive equipment.

Even small amounts of moisture can accumulate inside building elements, damaging building materials and widening the pathway for moisture. Over time, this can increase the likelihood of leaks and water ingress, potentially leading to damage or disruption.

 

Vertical cable entry sealed and weatherproofed on data centre in Dagenham

 

Why should building penetrations be protected from the earliest stages of a data centre project?

The construction of a data centre is often quick, with multiple trades working closely together. If building penetrations are left unprotected, or weatherproofing is delayed until later in the programme, the openings are more likely to be exposed to weather damage or accidental damage.

There’s also the chance that if a building penetration is left unsealed, other equipment or finishes may be installed over it. Installing the weatherproofing layer may then require items to be removed to provide access, then reinstalled, leading to delays and added labour costs.

Weatherproofing penetrations at the right time can help maintain the integrity of the building envelope throughout the build and protect it from weather ingress. It also reduces the likelihood of remedial works and helps to avoid programme delays.

What is the best way to weatherproof building penetrations on data centres?

There are many ways to seal building penetrations in data centres. Traditional systems, such as rigid or “dog-kennel” style enclosures, have been used in the past. But they can be bulky and difficult to maintain. They also limit flexibility where service layouts may change during the build.

In data centres, where service density is high and project requirements can change, a more adaptable approach to weatherproofing is often required.

At Jones Weatherproofing, we use cold-applied liquid weatherproofing based on unsaturated polyester resins. It is suitable for all roof types, including GRP, and creates a permanently resilient, UV-stable seal that provides long-term protection around building penetrations. The system is versatile – it can be adapted to suit last-minute changes to penetration configurations in new-build applications and is also suitable for sealing around penetrations in existing data centres.

How can I learn more about reducing the risk of exposed penetrations on data centres?

The team at Jones Weatherproofing has extensive experience in weatherproofing penetrations on data centres and other mission-critical buildings. To find out more about our weatherproofing system, or discuss how we can help you reduce the risk of exposed penetrations, please get in touch.

What is BROOF(t4)? A guide to roof fire classification and compliance

Share page here

Fire safety is a critical consideration for all buildings. As regulations and specifications have tightened in recent years, so has the need to demonstrate compliance. For roofs, fire safety standards have taken several forms, including the BROOF(t4) classification.

What is BROOF(t4)?

BROOF(t4 )is a fire classification that assesses a roof’s resistance to external fire sources, including burning embers and nearby fires. It is the highest classification for UK roof performance. It indicates that a complete roofing system – the combination of deck, vapour control layer (VCL), insulation, underlay, finishes and other treatments – has passed stringent testing.

What does BROOF(t4) testing involve?

External fire performance of roofs is assessed using test methods defined in CEN/TS 1187, with results classified in accordance with BS EN 13501-5. Testing must be carried out by an accredited third-party organisation.

There are four different tests defined by CEN/TS 1187. These tests use a burning brand – a standardised burning object – as the flame source. During each test, samples are exposed to realistic fire scenarios that simulate external fire conditions, such as airborne embers or flames from adjacent structures.

  • t1: Burning brands
  • t2: Burning brands with wind
  • t3: Burning brands with wind and supplementary radiant heat
  • t4: A two-stage exposure incorporating burning brands, wind and supplementary radiant heat

Classification is based on a range of performance criteria observed during testing under defined conditions. These include flame spread, fire penetration and burn characteristics.

The t4 test is commonly used in UK guidance, with BROOF(t4) being the highest classification achievable under EN 13501-5 for the external fire performance of roofs. This indicates that the roof system has demonstrated a high level of resistance to external fire spread under the specified test conditions. C, D, E and F classifications may also be granted to a roof system. FROOF(t4) is the lowest rating and indicates that no performance was determined.

Systems must be tested as a complete build-up. Any changes to the specification will require the complete roof system to be re-tested.

Is BROOF(t4) a requirement in the UK?

BROOF(t4) is the classification most commonly referenced in UK guidance and specifications. BROOF(t1) is often used in other countries or for specific applications.

A classification of BROOF(t4) demonstrates compliance for applications where roof coverings must meet specific performance standards. It is commonly used within fire safety guidance across the UK, including Approved Document B: Fire Safety (England).

Requirement B4 of Approved Document B (Volumes 1 and 2) states that the external envelope of a building should not:

  • Contribute to undue fire spread from one part of a building to another part.
  • Provide a medium for the spread of fire to adjacent buildings.
  • Be readily ignited by fires in adjacent buildings.

For a roof system to be considered “unrestricted” in use, Approved Document B states that it must achieve the BROOF(t4) classification. This applies across most building types, particularly those where proximity to other properties or increased fire risk requires the highest level of fire performance.

Similar guidance exists for the rest of the UK, including Approved Document B: Fire Safety (Wales), the Technical Handbooks (Section 2: Fire) in Scotland and Technical Booklet E: Fire Safety (Northern Ireland).

 

Complex service riser weatherproofed in London

 

Is BROOF(t4) the same as a Euroclass or Class 0 rating?

It is a common misconception that BROOF(t4) is interchangeable with the Euroclass B rating. However, they are not the same.

  • Euroclass B is a product classification under BS EN 13501-1. It measures the reaction to fire of individual materials.
  • BROOF(t4) is required by BS EN 13501-5 and assesses the external fire resistance of a complete roof system.

As has been demonstrated in real-world fire events and full-scale testing, an individual product’s fire performance does not always reflect how a complete system will behave in a fire. The interaction of materials is a critical consideration – and that is why BROOF(t4) testing is so important.

Class 0 is an older fire classification based on testing methods in BS 476. It was used to assess surface spread of flame and fire propagation characteristics on individual building materials and was widely referenced in earlier guidance. However, it does not assess reaction to external roof fire exposure, and it has largely been superseded by other fire classification systems.

What does BROOF(t4) mean for localised weatherproofing?

As already discussed, BROOF(t4) classification applies to a complete tested roof system, rather than to individual components or localised detailing.

Penetrations, joints and interfaces, along with their weatherproofing treatments, are therefore not typically assessed during fire testing. Instead, they must perform in a way that is compatible with the overall roof build-up.

Products used for detailing, such as liquid-applied weatherproofing systems, should be selected to ensure they are compatible with the wider roof assembly and do not negatively impact its external fire performance.

One way to do this is to use products that have been used within roof assemblies that achieve BROOF(t4) classification. This provides confidence that the detailing is compatible with compliant roof systems, provided it is installed in accordance with the tested build-up and relevant application guidance.

Does the Jones Weatherproofing system have BROOF(t4) classification?

As fire performance depends on the complete roof system, including the substrate, insulation and configuration, each application must be considered individually.
Jones Weatherproofing systems have been tested as part of complete roof assemblies that have achieved BROOF(t4) classification in accordance with BS EN 13501-5:2016.

These test results demonstrate that Jones Weatherproofing systems can form part of roof assemblies achieving BROOF(t4) when installed as part of a tested configuration.
For complex environments such as data centres, where high service densities and late-stage design changes require adaptable detailing, Jones Weatherproofing can help ensure appropriate specification and integration with the wider roof system.

To discuss the fire performance of the Jones Weatherproofing system in more detail, review our test reports or learn how we can support the weatherproofing of an upcoming mission-critical projects such as data centres, please get in touch.

A complete guide to BS 6229:2025

Share page here

Flat roofs are often used in the built environment, and they are a common feature in mission-critical projects such as data centres, transport hubs, hospitals and research facilities. In these locations, performance, reliability and durability are essential – any failure can have serious consequences.

That’s where BS 6229 comes in. This British Standard provides best-practice guidance for the design, construction and maintenance of flat roofs, helping to reduce risk and improve performance.

The standard was updated in 2025 to reflect changes in construction methods, materials and performance requirements. At Jones Weatherproofing, we keep a close eye on developments like these, and we are committed to ensuring our liquid-applied weatherproofing system is in line with the latest industry recommendations.

In this guide, we take a close look at BS 6229:2025 – what it is, what changed in the latest update and what those changes mean for architects, designers, contractors and weatherproofing teams.

What is BS 6229:2025?

BS 6229:2025 is the code of practice for flat roofs with continuously supported flexible waterproof coverings.

It provides guidance about how flat roofs should be designed and constructed. and it aims to mitigate risks such as poor drainage, inadequate ventilation and ineffective vapour control. Because BS 6229 considers the complete lifecycle of a flat roof, it also includes guidance on inspection and maintenance.

The guidance included in BS 6229 will be useful for anyone involved in the design, specification, installation or maintenance of flat roofing, including:

  • Architects and designers
  • Specifiers
  • Contractors and installers
  • Weatherproofing specialists
  • Maintenance service providers
  • Building owners
  • Construction product manufacturers and suppliers

What types of roof constructions are covered by BS 6229:2025?

The standard applies to all flat roofs that use continuously supported flexible waterproof coverings. This includes roofs supported by:

  • Heavy structures such as concrete slabs
  • Lightweight decks (metal or timber)

It also covers curved roofs with a pitch of up to 10 degrees.

Service risers being weatherproofed on The Apex Tribecca

 

What has changed in the BS 6229:2025 update?

Following a five-year review process, which involved input from across the roofing sector, the latest version, BS 6229:2025, was published in December 2025. It replaced the previous version, BS 6229:2018.

The update aims to improve flat roof performance, determine responsibilities and increase safety. It includes revisions to Clause 4 (design), Clause 5 (materials) and Clause 7 (care and maintenance). Terminology and definitions have also been clarified to help improve understanding across the roofing sector.

Matt Jones, commercial director at Jones Weatherproofing, explains that some of the changes are critical to the weatherproofing, “In terms of flat roof weatherproofing, some of the key changes to BS 6229 are about deck preparation and surface quality,” he says.

Deck preparation and documentation

The updated standard highlights the importance of careful deck design and preparation. It now requires a level survey and documented handover for decks or slabs

“This helps ensure that defects are identified early and that responsibility is clearly defined,” Matt says. “Knowing the condition of the roof deck can affect the way we approach weatherproofing, so the information these surveys provide can be instrumental in keeping the structure and its contents protected,” he adds.

Surface regularity

The surface quality is another important factor in long-term roof performance and weatherproofing.

Matt explains, “Uneven roof surfaces can lead to ponding or cause stress points in roofing membranes, so the surface quality of a roof is key in how weatherproofing performs long-term.”

Surface regularity (SR) classes describe how flat a roof deck is, based on defined tolerances. SR1 is the highest standard, while SR2 is generally acceptable for most roofing applications. The updated standard places greater emphasis on specifying and verifying surface regularity.

“An irregular surface doesn’t necessarily mean a roof can’t be effectively weatherproofed,” Matt adds. “The SR classes help the weatherproofing team better understand the flat roof’s specific requirements.”

Other changes to the new BS 6229:2025 include:

  • Roof falls and drainage – To support drainage on flat roofs, there is now a minimum 1:80 finished fall for general roof areas and internal gutters. The standard gives additional detail about prefabricated and site-formed falls. It also clarifies responsibility for back falls, which should help to improve installation practices and ensure that flat roofs don’t have unintended back falls.
  • Blue roofs – Blue roofs are designed to temporarily store rainwater and release it in a controlled way. BS 6229:2025 provides new guidance based on recent blue roof innovations and flat roof water management.
  • Thermal performance – The new guidance includes a 2.5% insulation increase for inverted warm roofs. This aligns with other energy efficiency targets, such as Approved Document L: Conservation of Fuel and Power.
  • Condensation control – The updated standard addresses condensation risk in accordance with BS 5250:2021, the code of practice for the management of moisture in buildings.
  • Fire safety – Fire performance has been reinforced in line with building regulations, including updated combustibility requirements within the roof build-up and clearer expectations for assessing fire performance. The revised standard also states that cross-laminated timber (CLT) decks should be avoided where possible, due to concerns around its fire behaviour, as well as moisture management and long-term durability. Where CLT is used, careful design and risk management are essential.

The update also highlights the importance of:

  • Efficient information exchange between project teams
  • High-quality installation standards
  • Effective maintenance planning

Together, these changes should help to improve the quality and performance of flat roofs across the UK.

Learn more about BS 6229:2025

To view the full version of the BS 6229:2025, the standard can be purchased from the British Standards Institute. The National Federation of Roofing Contractors (NFRC) has also produced a 16-page guide to the updated standard.

At Jones Weatherproofing, our team has implemented the changes to BS 6229:2025 across all of our projects, and our weatherproofing experts are available to provide advice and guidance on meeting the latest requirements.

Get in touch to discuss how Jones Weatherproofing can support the weatherproofing of your upcoming projects.

Using liquid weatherproofing to protect mission-critical buildings from water ingress

Share page here

In mission-critical buildings, weatherproofing plays an important role in preventing unplanned downtime and reducing risk. Whether it’s a data centre, hospital, telecommunication hub or another building where continuity of service is essential, the building envelope must effectively protect the structure and its contents from the elements.

Reliable weatherproofing around building penetrations seals the structure, preventing rainwater ingress and potential damage to equipment, building infrastructure and the building fabric. Specifying liquid weatherproofing, applied by a skilled professional, provides long-term performance, durability and reduced risk.

Below are the answers to some frequently asked questions about weatherproofing mission-critical buildings with liquid weatherproofing:

What is liquid weatherproofing?

In liquid weatherproofing, a liquid is applied in situ to create a seal around building penetrations. It can also be used at junctions or over damaged areas. Being a liquid, the weatherproofing solution can be worked into tight spaces and around complex shapes. It then cures to create a resilient seal that helps prevent water ingress at some of the building envelope’s most vulnerable points.

At Jones Weatherproofing, we use a tried-and-tested liquid weatherproofing resin that is cold-applied and solvent-free. This makes it suitable for all roof types, including GRP roofs. It requires no heat to apply or cure and hardens quickly – in less than an hour.

Why is liquid weatherproofing the best choice for protecting penetrations in mission-critical buildings?

For mission-critical buildings, protecting penetrations is especially important because these are often the most vulnerable points for water ingress. In these locations, even minor leaks can lead to costly disruption, damaged equipment or unplanned downtime.

Liquid weatherproofing is particularly suited to these applications because it is a versatile material that can be easily adapted to suit last-minute changes to penetration configurations. This flexibility helps to ensure that vulnerable details can be precisely sealed, even where service layouts are complex or have changed since initial installation.

At Jones Weatherproofing, our liquid weatherproofing material is based on unsaturated polyester resins and is solvent-free, making it suitable for use on all roof types, including GRP flat roofs. It is permanently resilient, UV-stable and, when it cures, it is open for vapour diffusion, helping to provide long-term protection at building penetrations.

What makes penetrations in mission-critical buildings so vulnerable to water ingress?

Mission-critical buildings typically have a very high number of building penetrations. These allow services such as electricity, data, water and waste to move in and out of the building effectively, while HVAC services, manufacturing plant, chimneys, structural elements and other elements may also penetrate the building fabric. Each of these penetrations is a potential source of water ingress and weather-related damage.

In mission-critical buildings, water damage isn’t just an inconvenience – it can be catastrophic. These buildings house essential services, from financial data in a data centre and life-saving hospital equipment to one-of-a-kind laboratory research. A leak can damage expensive equipment or the building fabric, cause delays or put occupants at risk.

 

Weatherproofing solutions in extreme conditions doha airport
Access hatch installation for Etihad stadium

 

How does liquid weatherproofing compare with off-the-shelf weatherproofing products?

Traditional weatherproofing systems, such as dog-kennel-style detailing, factory-made cabinets and metal flashings, are rigid and typically rely on pre-formed materials that fit around penetrations. They can take up a lot of valuable roof space, and there is a large risk of gaps, joints or weak points. In addition, the layout of penetrations when using these systems cannot be easily changed once they are installed.

In contrast, Jones Weatherproofing’s liquid-applied weatherproofing incorporates building penetrations as part of the building fabric. It is applied directly to building penetrations and can be used around complex shapes and irregular openings. Layout changes can be easily accommodated, resulting in a continuous, fully bonded layer that requires minimal maintenance.

Can liquid weatherproofing be applied around complex or non-standard roof details?

Yes. One of the main benefits of liquid weatherproofing is its ability to be applied around complex or non-standard roof details.
Because the material is a liquid, it can be applied in any configuration and around penetrations of any shape or size. It then cures to form a tight, resilient layer that is fully bonded to the substrate and the penetrating element, creating a continuous seal, regardless of shape or complexity.

How can weatherproofing risk be further reduced for mission-critical buildings?

For mission-critical buildings, long-term reliability is just as important as initial performance. At Jones Weatherproofing, our fully bonded liquid weatherproofing system offers long-term reliability and protection from water ingress. It’s also backed by a 25-year warranty, which can help to reduce risk and provide peace of mind that the penetrations will be supported long after project handover.

When should weatherproofing be considered during the construction programme of a mission-critical building?

The responsibility of weatherproofing building penetrations is often passed along from stakeholder to stakeholder throughout a building programme. This can mean that contractors are left to deal with it at the end of a project, when problems such as water ingress and damage to the building fabric become apparent. In these cases, access to the substrate may be difficult, requiring certain elements to be removed and later reinstalled. Remedial works may also be required to repair damage to the building structure.

With so much at stake in mission-critical buildings, early engagement with a weatherproofing specialist is highly recommended.

While the Jones Weatherproofing team can take on weatherproofing work at any stage of a project, the best results are achieved when we are consulted from the very early planning stages. We can carry out site surveys, review the building penetration requirements and advise on programming and coordination, helping to avoid last-minute design changes and remedial works and reducing overall risk.

How can I find out more about using liquid weatherproofing to protect mission-critical buildings from water ingress?

As experts in weatherproofing building penetrations, Jones Weatherproofing has worked on a wide range of mission-critical buildings – from data centres, energy facilities, hospitals and research labs to airports and transport hubs.

To learn more about our liquid weatherproofing system, or to discuss how we can support the weatherproofing for any upcoming mission-critical projects, please get in touch.

How liquid-applied weatherproofing preserves a building’s architectural vision

Share page here

Maintaining architectural intent throughout a construction project can be challenging – particularly around roof and vertical penetrations as well as other interfaces.

Whether vertical or at roof level, these complex details can disrupt clean lines and carefully considered aesthetics if they are not properly planned and installed. If weatherproofing is not carried out effectively, it can also impact building performance and durability.

A well-designed weatherproofing strategy plays a key role in preserving a building’s architectural vision. At Jones Weatherproofing, our liquid-applied weatherproofing provides an effective, visually unobtrusive way to protect the building fabric while supporting the overall design intent.

Why some weatherproofing methods may compromise design intent

Weatherproofing may seem like a straightforward part of a build, but it can be surprisingly complex, especially when buildings contain multiple penetrations, such as:

  • Service penetrations
  • Cable trays
  • Plant and equipment
  • Flues and chimneys
  • HVAC equipment and terminals
  • Roof access hatches and service walkways
  • Rooflights
  • Structural supports

As services pass in and out of the building envelope, they can disrupt the visual appearance – penetrating cladding in undesirable locations or introducing obtrusive, inconsistent detailing.

Meanwhile, roof penetrations can create visible interruptions to the roofline. They may look cluttered or bulky, depending on the type of weatherproofing that’s used. For example, traditional dog-kennel-style rooftop enclosures take up a lot of space and are typically prefabricated, so they are unlikely to blend in with the rest of the building’s design.

The role of liquid-applied weatherproofing in maintaining design intent

At Jones Weatherproofing, our liquid-applied weatherproofing system is flexible and versatile, making it suitable for use with all types of roofing materials, including GRP.

Because it is applied in situ and fully bonded to the substrate, the liquid-applied weatherproofing can be tailored to match complex shapes and layouts, without relying on prefabricated components or standardised details.

This allows each penetration or interface to be treated individually, while also providing a consistent, seamless finish across the whole roof area.

A liquid-applied approach allows each penetration or interface to be treated individually, explains Matt Jones, commercial director at Jones Weatherproofing, “Every penetration is different. With our liquid-applied weatherproofing system, we can form the detail around the penetrations, rather than forcing the penetrations into a standard system.”

Jones Weatherproofing also offers a colour-matching service, which means the waterproofing finish can be specified to blend in with surrounding materials or provide a deliberate contrast. This is ideal for retail outlets or other projects that require visual consistency and brand identity.

 

Complex service riser weatherproofed in London

 

The importance of early engagement in preserving design intent

Although weatherproofing is often left until the end of a project, the best results can be achieved when the weatherproofing team is consulted from the planning phase.

In the early stages of a project, the Jones Weatherproofing team will work closely with architects and designers to provide weatherproofing expertise – covering everything from weatherproofing methods and upstands to penetration layouts and project programming. This helps to avoid costly changes later on and reduces the risk of compromising the design.

As Matt explains, “The earlier we’re involved, the easier it is to align the weatherproofing with the architectural intent.”
He warns that holding off on weatherproofing may lead to remedial work or compromises. “We’re often brought in late, when other installations are blocking access to the penetrations or open penetrations are already experiencing water ingress. In these cases, installations may need to be removed, damage may need to be repaired, and compromises may need to be made.”

Maintaining your architectural vision with liquid-applied weatherproofing

As a globally trusted partner for weatherproofing, Jones Weatherproofing understands the importance of effective weatherproofing for building performance – and that visual impact also matters.

Our team works closely with architects and specifiers to develop tailored weatherproofing strategies that support both performance and design.

Get in touch to discuss how we can support the design of the weatherproofing for your upcoming projects.

Why weatherproofing needs to be part of the building design process

Share page here

Effective weatherproofing protects the building envelope, reduces risk and prevents costly repairs and disruption. While weatherproofing is often considered late in a project, the best strategy is to make it part of the building design process – including early engagement with a weatherproofing specialist.

Working with a weatherproofing specialist from the design stage:

  • Gives a better understanding of the building’s penetrations, their placement and weatherproofing requirements.
  • Provides an early opportunity to flag potential problems and find workarounds.
  • Enables improved on-site sequencing and collaboration with other trades.
  • Helps to keep the project on schedule and within budget.

In this post, we’ll cover some of the most frequently asked questions about early engagement with a weatherproofing specialist.

When should weatherproofing be considered in the building plan?

The best time to consider weatherproofing in a building project is as early as possible. At the design stage, the exact requirements for building penetrations may not be fully understood, but working with a weatherproofing specialist can provide valuable insight.

The Building Safety Act (BSA) 2022 introduced three gateways covering planning, pre-construction and pre-occupation. Weatherproofing must be considered at every stage, starting at design. Poor weatherproofing can compromise a building’s structural integrity and the safety of people and equipment. Good advice and high-quality weatherproofing are therefore critical for high-risk buildings, such as high-rise structures, and mission-critical facilities like data centres.

If the project is past the design stage and work has started without consulting a weatherproofing specialist, the principal contractor can mitigate risk by bringing in an expert at this stage. Although this may reveal the need for remedial work or highlight other issues, it’s better to identify and address these problems as soon as possible rather than letting them become more complex and costly.

What are the benefits of early engagement with a building weatherproofing specialist?

Engaging early with a building weatherproofing specialist gives you a better idea of what the weatherproofing will entail and when it should be implemented. The specialist can work with you to understand project objectives and advise on blending the weatherproofing with complex penetrations without compromising the building’s aesthetics.

The specialist can also advise on achieving compliance with national standards and compile the technical information needed to maintain the golden thread of building safety.

Other benefits to early engagement include:

  • Avoiding water damage during construction, preventing damp, mould, mildew and rot.
  • Improving on-site scheduling, collaboration with other trades and project sequencing.
  • Avoiding the need for remedial works.
  • Clarifying liability.
  • Keeping project delivery on track.
  • Ensuring work is backed by a warranty.

 

Three technical leads examining roof details for a roofing project

 

What are the risks of treating weatherproofing as an afterthought?

When weatherproofing is treated as an afterthought, projects often face costly remedial work to fix leaks, damp or water ingress. In many cases, building elements installed over the penetration must be removed to allow the weatherproofing team access. Remedial work may also compromise the original design intent.

Other risks include:

  • Compromised structural integrity due to prolonged exposure to moisture.
  • Increased likelihood of mould, mildew and rot affecting the building and its occupants.
  • Project delays and increased costs.
  • Potential health and safety issues for workers and future occupants.

Who is responsible for installing and weatherproofing building penetrations?

Building penetrations and their weatherproofing are often treated as afterthoughts because responsibility for them can be unclear. Engaging a specialist weatherproofing contractor early helps eliminate this ambiguity, ensuring that penetrations are correctly installed and sealed, and that work is coordinated with other trades.

How should weatherproofing be coordinated between trades?

With early engagement, weatherproofing contractors can coordinate with architects and specifiers, as well as all on-site trades, including M&E contractors, roofing contractors and cladding installers, to ensure that weatherproofing is carried out at the right time.
By installing and sealing penetrations in the correct sequence alongside other building elements, the weatherproofing contractor can prevent water damage and access the penetration easily, without having to remove completed installations that could otherwise be in the way. Early coordination also helps to reduce congestion on site, especially towards the end of a project when multiple trades are vying for limited space on the roof.

What happens if there are last-minute changes to the penetrations’ design and weatherproofing?

Early engagement with a weatherproofing specialist doesn’t mean that all decisions made at the design stage are set in stone. A building’s penetrations and weatherproofing requirements can change as a project progresses, and the weatherproofing contractor will work with you throughout the project, adjusting the plan as necessary.

Here at Jones Weatherproofing, we offer a completely bespoke weatherproofing system that allows for last-minute changes to be accommodated easily – without compromising performance, the project schedule or compliance.

What’s the most flexible way to weatherproof building penetrations?

Traditional penetration weatherproofing methods primarily rely on roofing cabinets and ready-made fittings. These don’t provide the flexibility that’s often required in real-world projects or to accommodate last-minute changes.

At Jones Weatherproofing, we use a liquid weatherproofing solution that provides flexibility and long-term durability. It can be applied directly to, and around building penetrations, and is compatible with most roofing materials, including GRP.

Because it is a cold-applied liquid, our system provides a bespoke finish that fits around any building details. Once cured, it forms a continuous and fully bonded layer that is UV-stable and requires minimal maintenance.

How do I start planning a weatherproofing strategy?

To create a robust weatherproofing strategy, architects should engage with an expert early in the design process. By specifying a Jones Weatherproofing solution, you can have peace of mind that your design vision will be fully respected and that the building is protected against water ingress and other risks.

Get in touch to discuss how we can support the weatherproofing for any upcoming projects.